The Dark at the End of the Tunnel |
||
The Denouement of Neo-Noir |
||
|
No. 81 |
July 7, 2005 |
"Sin City” marks the
end of neo-noir. After the hypertrophied, hyperstylized presentation
in the Robert Rodriguez-Quentin Tarantino-directed
film, neo-noir is finished creatively.1 By neo-noir, I mean a revived extension of noir tradition, either “revisionist” or “formulaic,” since about 1960.2 This distinguishes it from original or classic noir, across media, from the early ‘20s to the late ‘50s.3 A French critic re-defined “noir” as an esthetic term in 1946,4 but it only achieved widespread use in the early 1970s,5 coinciding with a swell of neo-noir releases.6 I thought neo-noir might be finished in the late ‘90s, but that was from a glut of product, overexposure, and misuse of the term.7 Instead, only now, with “Sin City,” has neo-noir reached a comprehensive creative apotheosis, similar to classic noir around 1958-59.8 Rodriguez and Frank Miller, creator of the source material, liberally borrowed numerous noir elements, then distilled them into a nearly undiluted simulacrum of the noir esthetic,9 as genre, tone, mood and style.10 Nothing more seems possible within its expansive limits. Although that won’t stop further product from release – including a planned sequel to “Sin City” – at least for a while.11 |
E-mail: austindispatches@swbell.net | Home | Archives |